托福綜合寫作回憶和解析含范文 培頓 教育老師整理提供,本次考試托福寫作綜合點評:更多托福備考干貨,請關(guān)注培頓 教育,在線咨詢網(wǎng)站客服老師預約托福試聽課
綜合寫作
話題分類藝術(shù)類題目
考題回憶總論點Laogoon statue 不是米開朗基羅的仿品
閱讀部分拉奧孔雕像是仿造的
1. 米開朗琪羅在成名前曾偽造丘比特,鑒于他的造假經(jīng)歷,拉奧孔很可能也是他偽造的
2. 拉奧孔雕像中間有一個圖案,和米開朗琪羅早年一副畫作很像,這副畫作很可能是米開朗琪羅偽造拉奧孔的基礎(chǔ)
3. 這樣會很賺錢。米開朗琪羅一旦與售賣藝術(shù)品的人串通,可以賺很多錢
聽力部分拉奧孔雕像不是仿造
1. 米開朗琪羅成名前的確偽造丘比特,但他這樣做是為了像世人展示自己的天賦。當丘比特被大眾認可,米開朗琪羅逐漸成名。對后來功成名就的他而言,沒理由再去進行偽造
2. 米開朗琪羅的畫作和雕像上的圖案有很多不同。比如arm的位置不一樣,還有雕塑的back twisting
3. 米開朗琪羅這樣做風險太高,他不會冒險。他的客戶基本是國王、貴族大臣,如果他敢造價,一經(jīng)發(fā)現(xiàn),他的事業(yè)就全毀了
解題思路
參考范文In the reading passage, the author presents three different reasons to prove that the Laogoon statue was a counterfeit created by Michelangelo, which has been seriously challenged by the professor in the lecture, and the professor claims that this statue was not a counterfeit.
First of all, the reading believes that Michelangelo once faked a Cupid so it is likely that he could fake Laogoon. However, the lecturer believes that this is groundless because Michelangelo’s Cupid was to show his talent to the public and his cupid was well accepted by the public , which brought his good fame and prestige. With rise in personal fame and reputation, Michelangelo did not have solid reason to counterfeit.
Secondly, in spite of great similarities of patterns mentioned in the reading, the professor has pointed out several differences between Michelangelo’s paintings and his statues. One of the differences is the position of arms and the other one is the back twisting of the statue. Thus, it is quite obvious that the reasons given in the reading is less convincing.
Lastly, the reading material suggested that it was extremely profitable for Michelangelo to counterfeit, but the lecturer absolutely refute the statement by explaining that all Michelangelo’s clients came from upper class, those from royal or aristocratic families. If Michelangelo was found to counterfeit, it would ruin his whole career.
更多托福備考干貨,請關(guān)注培頓 教育,在線咨詢網(wǎng)站客服老師預約托福試聽課